- From: Noam Rosenthal <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2023 23:55:26 -0700
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 11 September 2023 06:55:33 UTC
@noamr commented on this pull request. > @@ -8485,6 +8618,92 @@ with a <var>promise</var>, <var>request</var>, <var>responseObject</var>, and an </div> +<h3 id=fetch-later-method>FetchLater method</h3> + +<pre class=idl> + +dictionary DeferredRequestInit : RequestInit { + DOMHighResTimeStamp backgroundTimeout; If that's the case, what's the point of this timeout at all? Perhaps we should spec & ship a substantially simpler version without it, and people can implement a regular timeout in userland? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/1647#discussion_r1321072297 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <whatwg/fetch/pull/1647/review/1619248024@github.com>
Received on Monday, 11 September 2023 06:55:33 UTC