- From: Hongchan Choi <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2023 10:43:46 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 7 September 2023 17:43:52 UTC
That's an interesting suggestion. However, the level of precision in Compute Pressure API is not enough (4 buckets) and the design of the Worker QoS proposal seems quite distant from this API. (i.e. you're setting the option at construction time) Based on the developer survey we conducted, the bucket size 4 is not suitable for anything useful. Another approach that we're discussing at the moment is using the strong permission signal (e.g. microphone) to allow the full precision of capacity value. Conversely, the API only offers limited buckets (~10) without explicit user permission. <img width="745" alt="Screenshot 2023-09-07 at 10 39 54 AM" src="https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/assets/676891/c5746322-df9b-44ed-8e58-fb2991cc43a7"> -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/843#issuecomment-1710549078 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/843/1710549078@github.com>
Received on Thursday, 7 September 2023 17:43:52 UTC