Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Add lock options to requestPointerLock (#49)

@marcoscaceres commented on this pull request.



> +            <li>If the request was not started from an [=engagement gesture=]
+            and the {{Document}} has not previously released a successful Pointer
+            Lock with {{Document/exitPointerLock()}}:

Wait!!!! We should fix this so that it requires "transient activation" or "sticky activation"  based on the lock already being applied. The "engagement gesture" is not a thing (or should not be a thing defined/used in this spec). 



-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/pointerlock/pull/49#pullrequestreview-1700445256
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3c/pointerlock/pull/49/review/1700445256@github.com>