- From: vmpstr <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2023 10:49:50 -0800
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 13 November 2023 18:49:59 UTC
Hi @LeaVerou, Thank you for the feedback. The use-case described in https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8960 is the same use-case [described in the explainer](https://github.com/vmpstr/web-proposals/blob/main/explainers/view-transition-types.md#:~:text=This%20works%20well,this%20use%20case.), and is the main use-case for this API addition to the View Transitions feature. We are also discussing using types for a similar use-case in the cross-document navigation case, where the polyfill is potentially harder to implement. We are early in the discussion of how types can be used in that case though. I've added [alternatives considered](https://github.com/vmpstr/web-proposals/blob/main/explainers/view-transition-types.md#alternatives-considered) section that mentions this as well. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/908#issuecomment-1808802510 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/908/1808802510@github.com>
Received on Monday, 13 November 2023 18:49:59 UTC