- From: Matthew Phillips <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2023 10:15:06 -0800
- To: WICG/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 13 November 2023 18:15:13 UTC
@tbondwilkinson > How do non-JS frameworks handle interactivity - there's still some JS that does that, or am I missing the point? Let me clarify something that I think I haven't articulated well in this thread. My opposition to the current proposal is this: 1. The templating proposal is helpful for those following an "isomorphic" architecture. (particularly if we include the `parseparts` part). 2. Isomorphic architecture is really only possible in JS backends. 3. Therefore, this proposal is only helpful to a subset of applications. 4. Furthermore, this proposal is big and will take a long time and a lot of resources to see through. It will be seen as "the way" going forward and make it more difficult for alternatives to ever happen. ---- My counter-proposal is not attempting to solve the problem of "isomorphic" architecture. It is instead looking for another way to achieve the same underlying goals that we all want; a way to do declarative DOM updates, and it is trying to do so in a way that is decoupled from the backend. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/issues/1035#issuecomment-1808738052 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <WICG/webcomponents/issues/1035/1808738052@github.com>
Received on Monday, 13 November 2023 18:15:13 UTC