- From: Garret Rieger <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 16:44:27 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 31 May 2023 23:44:33 UTC
As far as I'm aware all of the remaining open issue from the HTTP review are against the "Range Request" variant of incremental font transfer ([list of non-range request tagged issues](https://github.com/w3c/IFT/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+-label%3A%22Range+Request%22)). Range request is still under development so it is not part of this review request. Re: the caching issue you linked I've reopened that with a couple of additional things I think we should add based on the discussion so far. If there's additional changes you think we should make please let me know on the issue. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/849#issuecomment-1571101153 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/849/1571101153@github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 31 May 2023 23:44:33 UTC