Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Element.checkVisibility review (Issue #734)

Thanks for that @josepharhar. We discussed again in today's TAG plenary call. Regarding multi-stakeholder support, we also note from [caniuse](https://caniuse.com/?search=checkvisibility) data that there are multiple implementations, which is also not reflected in Chromestatus. Can you please update, or maybe start using the [BCD data](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/MDN/Writing_guidelines/Page_structures/Compatibility_tables) which powers CanIUse to also power this indication? We still have some reservations regarding sync vs. async as [plinss highlighted](https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/734#issuecomment-1162190144) however we are going to move that discussion to our Design Principles work.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/734#issuecomment-1561363813
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/734/1561363813@github.com>