- From: Noam Rosenthal <notifications@github.com>
 - Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 04:32:17 -0700
 - To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
 - Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
 
Received on Friday, 19 May 2023 11:32:22 UTC
@noamr commented on this pull request.
> @@ -8449,6 +8597,60 @@ with a <var>promise</var>, <var>request</var>, <var>responseObject</var>, and an
 </div>
 
 
+<h3 id=fetch-later-method>FetchLater method</h3>
+
+<pre class=idl>
+
+dictionary DeferredRequestInit : RequestInit {
+  DOMHighResTimeStamp backgroundTimeout;
+};
+
+partial interface mixin WindowOrWorkerGlobalScope {
+  [NewObject] Promise<Response> fetchLater(RequestInfo input, optional DeferredRequestInit init = {});
Hmm I see your point. @annevk how would you feel about having the signature be `DeferredFetchResult fetchLater(...)`, where `DeferredFetchResult` has a `{ sent: false }` that turns to true synchronously at the appropriate moment? (BFCache restore after send / re-show after timers frozen)
-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/1647#discussion_r1198859446
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <whatwg/fetch/pull/1647/review/1434265198@github.com>
Received on Friday, 19 May 2023 11:32:22 UTC