Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Should Cache#addAll reject with AbortSignal's reason if the signal is already aborted? (Issue #1684) from Scott Haseley on 2023-07-26 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from July 2023)

From: Scott Haseley <notifications@github.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 15:43:49 -0700
To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1684/1652637822@github.com>

Oh, looks like we're not using the input Request object signals at all? Good catch; +1 propagating the first exception/abort reason, whether from an associated signal or other reason.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1684#issuecomment-1652637822
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1684/1652637822@github.com>

Received on Wednesday, 26 July 2023 22:43:55 UTC