Re: [whatwg/fetch] HTTPS upgrades proposal (PR #1655)

@meacer commented on this pull request.



> +    <p>If one or more of the following conditions are met, return:
+    <ul>
+      <li><p><var>request</var>'s <a for="request">destination</a> is not "<code>document</code>"
+
+      <li><p><var>request</var>'s <a for="request">method</a> is not "<code>GET</code>"
+
+      <li><p><var>request</var>'s <a for="request">URL</a>'s <a for="url">scheme</a> is not
+      "<code>http</code>"
+
+      <li><p><var>request</var>'s <a for="request">URL</a>'s <a for="url">host</a> is exempted from
+      upgrades in an <a>implementation-defined</a> way.
+
+      <p class="example" id="example-https-upgrades-exempted-hosts">If <a for=url>host</a> is a
+      non-registrable or non-assignable domain name such as .local or an IP address that falls in a
+      range reserved for non-publicly routable networks, the implementation might return without
+      modifying <var>request</var>.

Original wording said "non-unique hostnames" but we removed it per mikewest's comment. Should it just say "is non-assignable domain name ..." instead?

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/1655#discussion_r1275435965
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/fetch/pull/1655/review/1548518671@github.com>