Re: [whatwg/fetch] HTTPS upgrades proposal (PR #1655)

@christhompson commented on this pull request.



> +
+      <li><p><var>request</var>'s <a for="request">URL</a>'s <a for="url">host</a> is exempted from
+      upgrades in an <a>implementation-defined</a> way.
+
+      <p class="example">If <a for=url>host</a> is a non-registrable or non-assignable domain name
+      such as .local or an IP address that falls in a range reserved for non-publicly routable
+      networks, the implementation might return without modifying <var>request</var>.
+    </ul>
+  </li>
+
+  <li><p>If <var>request</var>'s <code>https-upgrade-fallback-url</code> is non-null, clear the
+  <code>https-upgrade</code> and <code>https-upgrade-fallback-url</code> flags and return.
+
+  <p class="note">This is a fallback request that shouldn't be upgraded again.
+
+  <li><p>Otherwise, upgrade the request by setting the following fields:

Done (I think this is okay without adding the note)

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/1655#discussion_r1260153473
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/fetch/pull/1655/review/1524980715@github.com>