- From: Daniel Appelquist <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 11:56:37 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 10 July 2023 18:56:42 UTC
It was brought to my attention today that my comment above could be clearer. To clarify: we pay attention to multi-stakeholder support as a key indicator of consensus. As stated in the [Ethical Web Principles](https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/838#issuecomment-1629360709), the Web is multi-browser, multi-OS, multi-device. Multiple implementations are also part of the [W3C process](https://www.w3.org/2023/Process-20230612/#implementation-experience) and [WHATWG process](https://whatwg.org/working-mode). We are also considering the complexity we're adding to the web platform – and disparity of implementations of web feature adds to that complexity. This is why we ask for "Key pieces of existing multi-stakeholder review" in our review request template. Ideally we would like to see expressed support from at least 2 browser engines. It would also be interesting to know if there has been support from other Chromium-based browsers and/or from web developers. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/747#issuecomment-1629533922 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/747/1629533922@github.com>
Received on Monday, 10 July 2023 18:56:42 UTC