[w3ctag/design-reviews] WebDriver BiDi (Issue #869)

こんにちは TAG-さん!

I'm requesting a TAG review of WebDriver BiDi.

WebDriver BiDi is a bidirectional protocol for browser automation, building on and extending [the “classic” WebDriver protocol](https://w3c.github.io/webdriver/).

  - Explainer: https://github.com/w3c/webdriver-bidi/blob/master/explainer.md
  - Specification URL: https://w3c.github.io/webdriver-bidi/
  - Tests: https://wpt.fyi/results/webdriver/tests/bidi
  - Security and Privacy self-review: WebDriver BiDi is not a Web-exposed feature, but is instead a separate protocol that requires explicit opt-in on the user’s local system. The usual S&P review doesn’t apply here.
  - GitHub repo (if you prefer feedback filed there): https://github.com/w3c/webdriver-bidi
  - Primary contacts:
      - David Burns (@AutomatedTester), BrowserStack
      - James Graham (@jgraham), Mozilla
      - Mathias Bynens (@mathiasbynens), Google
      - Philip Jägenstedt (@foolip), Google
      - Sam Sneddon (@gsnedders), Apple
  - Organization(s)/project(s) driving the specification: [Browser Testing and Tools Working Group](https://www.w3.org/groups/wg/browser-tools-testing/)
  - Key pieces of existing multi-stakeholder review or discussion of this specification: https://github.com/w3c/webdriver-bidi/issues
  - External status/issue trackers for this specification (publicly visible, e.g. Chrome Status):
      - [Chrome’s WebDriver BiDi implementation tracker](https://github.com/GoogleChromeLabs/chromium-bidi/issues)
      - [Firefox’s WebDriver BiDi implementation tracker](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?product=Remote%20Protocol&component=WebDriver%20BiDi)

Further details:

  - [x] I have reviewed the TAG's [Web Platform Design Principles](https://w3ctag.github.io/design-principles/)
  - Relevant time constraints or deadlines: N/A
  - The group where the work on this specification is currently being done: [Browser Testing and Tools Working Group](https://www.w3.org/groups/wg/browser-tools-testing/)
  - Major unresolved issues with or opposition to this specification: N/A
  - This work is being funded by: N/A

We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as:

  💬 leave review feedback as a **comment in this issue**

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/869
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/869@github.com>