- From: Yves Lafon <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2023 00:46:00 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 4 July 2023 07:46:05 UTC
Looks good, however I see potential issues: In local networks, having `http` instead of `https` for some servers that don't have (or want to have) access to the internet is more common, if the host name resolves to a local network, should the speculative upgrade happen in that case? Also, could there be a http response header put on https-served site to indicate that content on http is not the same and not redirect to https? (ie: to signal that https update should not be done optimistically) -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/853#issuecomment-1619707116 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/853/1619707116@github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 4 July 2023 07:46:05 UTC