Re: [whatwg/fetch] Editorial: account for HTTP updates (PR #1587)

@dlrobertson commented on this pull request.

Thanks!

> +urlPrefix:https://httpwg.org/specs/rfc9110.html#;type:dfn;spec:http

+    url:method.overview;text:method
+    url:fields.names;text:field-name
+    url:rfc.section.9.2.1;text:unsafe
+
+urlPrefix:https://httpwg.org/specs/rfc9111.html#;type:dfn;spec:http-caching

+    url:delta-seconds;text:delta-seconds
+    url:age.calculations;text:current age
+    url:calculating.freshness.lifetime;text:freshness lifetime
+    url:response.cacheability;text:Storing Responses in Caches
+    url:invalidation;text:Invalidating Stored Responses
+    url:validation.sent;text:Sending a Validation Request
+    url:constructing.responses.from.caches;text:Constructing Responses from Caches
+    url:freshening.responses;text:Freshening Stored Responses upon Validation
+
+urlPrefix:https://httpwg.org/specs/rfc9112.html#;type:dfn;spec:http1


I think this should be `https://httpwg.org/specs/rfc9112.html#status.line`.


> @@ -564,6 +558,9 @@ consistency.
 
 <h4 id=terminology-headers>Headers</h4>
 
+<p class=note>HTTP generally refers to headers as ‘fields’ or ‘header fields’. The web platform uses
+the more colloquial term. [[HTTP]]

nit: I recognize that this is in the "Headers" section, but could we specify what the colloquial term is?

```suggestion
the more colloquial term  ‘header’. [[HTTP]]
```

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/1587#pullrequestreview-1239469238

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/fetch/pull/1587/review/1239469238@github.com>