- From: Joshua Bell <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2023 16:27:36 -0700
- To: w3c/IndexedDB <IndexedDB@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 3 August 2023 23:27:41 UTC
@inexorabletash commented on this pull request. > <!-- ============================================================ --> <div algorithm> -To <dfn>run an upgrade transaction</dfn> with |connection| (a [=/connection=]) -which is used to update the [=/database=], a new |version| to be set -for the [=/database=], and a |request|, run these steps: +To <dfn>upgrade a database</dfn> with |connection| (a [=/connection=]), a new |version|, and a |request|, run these steps: Good question. After a bit of searching I don't see many references to the old phrase out on the webs, so I'm suspecting the number of direct links into the algorithm from anywhere other than issues in this repo are low. So... leaning to "no" but we can restore the id if anyone complains? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/pull/409#discussion_r1283811582 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3c/IndexedDB/pull/409/review/1561978619@github.com>
Received on Thursday, 3 August 2023 23:27:41 UTC