- From: Lea Verou <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2023 01:40:33 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 3 August 2023 08:40:39 UTC
Hi Koji, We discussed this today in a breakout. This sounds like a plan. It may be good to try and ship orphan control at the same time as `text-wrap: pretty` to further avoid the possibility of developers using this as a proxy for orphan control. We think the specific heuristics to employ are better decided within the CSS WG (not necessarily as a normative part of the spec), however we'd recommend the multiple heuristics employed by `text-wrap: pretty` are in the same "caliber", i.e. not something major like orphan control plus something that seems minor from the authors' point of view, otherwise it may still be used as a property for orphan control, with the understanding that it also "has some quirks", especially if it's the *only* way to do orphan control in CSS. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/864#issuecomment-1663539298 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/864/1663539298@github.com>
Received on Thursday, 3 August 2023 08:40:39 UTC