Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] text-wrap: pretty (Issue #864)

That's a very good point, thank you. We saw many strong feedback on avoiding orphans from web developers ([example 1](https://clagnut.com/blog/2424#:~:text=Another%20value%20in%20the%20specification%20is%20text%2Dwrap%3Apretty.), [2](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3473#issuecomment-1620737159)) and it wasn't easy to determine the next strong request from the [feature candidates](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/672).

But it's also not difficult to pick one more feature, if we put the request priority aside. I'll think about it.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/864#issuecomment-1659704932
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/864/1659704932@github.com>