Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Disambiguate "running" for transactions (PR #409)

@a-sully approved this pull request.

LGTM % optional nits

> @@ -1001,7 +1001,7 @@ Transactions are expected to be short lived. This is encouraged by the
 described below.
 
 <aside class=note>
-  Authors can still cause transactions to run for a long time;
+  Authors can still cause transactions to stay alive for a long time;

```suggestion
  Authors can still cause transactions to stay [=transaction/live|alive=] for a long time;
```
Shall we linkify this?

>  <!-- ============================================================ -->
 
 <div algorithm>
 
-To <dfn>run an upgrade transaction</dfn> with |connection| (a [=/connection=])
-which is used to update the [=/database=], a new |version| to be set
-for the [=/database=], and a |request|, run these steps:
+To <dfn>upgrade a database</dfn> with |connection| (a [=/connection=]), a new |version|, and a |request|, run these steps:

Do you think it's worthwhile to preserve the old ID? There probably don't exist many references to https://www.w3.org/TR/IndexedDB/#run-an-upgrade-transaction out on the interwebs, but if there are they'd be broken

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/pull/409#pullrequestreview-1559975928
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3c/IndexedDB/pull/409/review/1559975928@github.com>