Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Disambiguate "running" for transactions (PR #409)

@evanstade commented on this pull request.



>    The {{IDBOpenDBRequest/upgradeneeded!!event}} event isn't fired, and thus the
   [=/upgrade transaction=] isn't started, until all other
   [=/connections=] to the same [=/database=] are closed. This ensures
   that all previous transactions are [=transaction/finished=]. As long
-  as an [=/upgrade transaction=] is running, attempts to open more
+  as an [=/upgrade transaction=] is [=transaction/live=], attempts to open more
   [=/connections=] to the same [=/database=] are delayed, and any
   attempts to use the same [=/connection=] to start additional
   transactions by calling {{IDBDatabase/transaction()}} will throw an
   exception. Thus [=/upgrade transactions=] not only ensure that no

I agree that dropping it might ultimately be less confusing since it's essentially restating information from elsewhere in the doc, but less clearly (imo). The new form is better too.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/pull/409#discussion_r1282472626
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3c/IndexedDB/pull/409/review/1559923458@github.com>