Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: Allow WebIDL binding to expose parameters' types and enums' values (Issue #1183)

> I'm not sure why we should have many new issues to discuss this when we couldn't even get [whatwg/webidl#107](https://github.com/whatwg/webidl/issues/107) resolved?

François and I have filed two new proposals for tackling this problem because we believed this would be the best way to facilitate renewed/continued discussion of the topic. If you think there's a better way, such as continuing on the original thread, please give us a specific proposal. We welcome meta-feedback on the best way to engage in this forum. But even more than that, we are eager to hear your thoughts on our specific proposals.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/1183#issuecomment-1527530510
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/dom/issues/1183/1527530510@github.com>

Received on Friday, 28 April 2023 13:01:58 UTC