Re: [WICG/webcomponents] [declarative-custom-elements] Capabilities needed and open questions (Issue #1009) from Bruce B. Anderson on 2023-04-27 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from April 2023)

From: Bruce B. Anderson <notifications@github.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 09:26:26 -0700
To: WICG/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <WICG/webcomponents/issues/1009/1525996142@github.com>

That's what I thought, looking at that example of the percentage-bar.  I guess, then, I'm the only one who thinks it is worth pursuing making the first instance also serve as a definition, as the second link I provide demonstrates.

Does my open question make sense to you now?  I think you are saying no, by definition, the definition should not also be an instance.  I.e. my open question has been opened and shut :-).  I agree taking the stance you are taking simplifies things.  Maybe I can reraise the possibility once that's accomplished (baby steps).



-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/issues/1009#issuecomment-1525996142
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <WICG/webcomponents/issues/1009/1525996142@github.com>

Received on Thursday, 27 April 2023 16:26:31 UTC