Re: [whatwg/streams] Add support for ReadableStream "transfer" type (PR #1271)

OK, I'll start doing it.
Rethinking a bit, I wonder the following:
- Would `type:'serialize'` be a better name than `type:'transfer'` (which conflicts a bit with transform streams, transferable streams and we sometimes serialize and not transfer chunks)?
- Is the syntactic sugar for transferable objects (`enqueue(videoFrame)` instead of `enqueue(videoFrame, [videoFrame])`) a good idea now that we have the additional `transfer` parameter?

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/streams/pull/1271#issuecomment-1505748318
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/streams/pull/1271/c1505748318@github.com>