[whatwg/encoding] Editorial: use leading and pending surrogate (PR #309)

Arguably all the lead/trail byte stuff needs to be made consistent with this. Ugh.

Also, when I have more patience I should create an abstract operation for

> 0x10000 + ((<var>leadingSurrogate</var> − 0xD800) << 10) + (<var>item</var> − 0xDC00).
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:

  https://github.com/whatwg/encoding/pull/309

-- Commit Summary --

  * Editorial: use leading and pending surrogate

-- File Changes --

    M encoding.bs (55)

-- Patch Links --

https://github.com/whatwg/encoding/pull/309.patch
https://github.com/whatwg/encoding/pull/309.diff

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/encoding/pull/309
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/encoding/pull/309@github.com>