Re: [whatwg/webidl] Editorial: Define the WebIDL string types in terms of Infra types. (PR #1287)

@domfarolino commented on this pull request.



> @@ -7471,12 +7474,11 @@ value when its bit pattern is interpreted as an unsigned 64 bit integer.
 
 <div id="USVString-to-es" algorithm="convert an USVString to an ECMAScript value">
 
-    An IDL {{USVString}} value is [=converted to an ECMAScript value|converted=]
-    to an ECMAScript value by running the following algorithm:
-
-    1.  Let |scalarValues| be the sequence of [=scalar values=] the {{USVString}} represents.
-    1.  Let |string| be the sequence of [=code units=] that results from encoding |scalarValues| in UTF-16.
-    1.  Return the String value that represents the same sequence of [=code units=] as |string|.
+    The result of [=converted to an ECMAScript value|converting=]
+    an IDL {{USVString}} value to an ECMAScript
+    value is the String
+    value that represents the sequence of [=code units=]
+    in the IDL {{USVString}}.

Do we have to consider the String length limit in ECMAScript at all? https://tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-ecmascript-language-types-string-type

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/webidl/pull/1287#pullrequestreview-1370069932
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/webidl/pull/1287/review/1370069932@github.com>