Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Early design review request: IPA (Issue #823)

Regarding priorities and "loose", I was loosely referring to [this important qualification](https://www.w3.org/TR/design-principles/#priority-of-constituencies):

> Like all principles, this isn’t absolute. Ease of authoring affects how content reaches users. User agents have to prioritize finite engineering resources, which affects how features reach authors. Specification writers also have finite resources, and theoretical concerns reflect underlying needs of all of these groups.

That said, even a strict ordering justifies our conclusion, though it requires acknowledging that some benefits are indirect.  That is, the indirect benefit to users as a result of serving the needs of authors (again, via an ability to more effectively support their work with advertising) outweighs or is neutral with the loss associated with those users participating in an aggregated measurement system. And the benefit to authors is potentially significant.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/823#issuecomment-1493055865
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/823/1493055865@github.com>