Re: [whatwg/webidl] draft: Interaction with the Stage 2 Record & Tuple proposal for ECMAScript (PR #1184)

Another missing conversion is [`any`](https://webidl.spec.whatwg.org/#es-any). This one seems important because adding a new ES language type would cause it to have undefined behavior. The defined behavior could be to throw a TypeError if the goal is to be conservative pending a clearer picture of what’s needed.

Union conversion and the overload resolution algorithms are affected similarly I think.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/webidl/pull/1184#issuecomment-1250022172

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/webidl/pull/1184/c1250022172@github.com>

Received on Saturday, 17 September 2022 07:41:33 UTC