Re: [whatwg/webidl] draft: Interaction with the Stage 2 Record & Tuple proposal for ECMAScript (PR #1184)

> That’s probably just because it’s a work in progress, but it would be funny if we couldn’t use em for that, so I figured it may be worth pointing out just in case it was overlooked.

> Another missing conversion is [`any`](https://webidl.spec.whatwg.org/#es-any). This one seems important because adding a new ES language type would cause it to have undefined behavior. 

Thank you for this, I definitely overlooked both, will try to add them soon!

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/webidl/pull/1184#issuecomment-1251961096

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/webidl/pull/1184/c1251961096@github.com>

Received on Tuesday, 20 September 2022 07:38:37 UTC