- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 15:48:27 -0700
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <whatwg/fetch/pull/1513/review/1153906374@github.com>
@domenic commented on this pull request. > +that offers a limited view on an associated <a for=/>response</a>. This associated +<a for=/>response</a> can be accessed through <a>filtered response</a>'s associated +<dfn export id=concept-internal-response for="filtered response">internal response</dfn> (a +<a for=/>response</a> that is neither a <a for=/>network error</a> nor a +<a for=/>filtered response</a>). + +<p>Unless stated otherwise a <a for=/>filtered response</a>'s associated concepts (such as its +<a for=response>body</a>) refer to the associated concepts of its +<a for="filtered response">internal response</a>. (The exceptions to this are listed below as part +of defining the concrete types of <a for=/>filtered responses</a>.) + +<div class=note> + <p>The <a for=/>fetch</a> algorithm returns such a view to ensure APIs do not accidentally leak + information. If the information needs to be exposed for legacy reasons, e.g., to feed image data to + a decoder, the associated <a for="filtered response">internal response</a> can be used, which is + only "accessible" to internal specification algorithms. I stil find this sentence confusing them... what is an example of a non-internal specification algorithm, which doesn't have access? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/1513#discussion_r1003838705 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <whatwg/fetch/pull/1513/review/1153906374@github.com>
Received on Monday, 24 October 2022 22:48:39 UTC