Re: [whatwg/webidl] Add discussion of unexposed interfaces? (Issue #1236) from Rick Byers on 2022-11-24 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from November 2022)

From: Rick Byers <notifications@github.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 07:45:22 -0800
To: whatwg/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <whatwg/webidl/issues/1236/1326611759@github.com>

> Report is already exposed in gecko

When was that added? [MDN BCD doesn't have it](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Report) and I definitely don't see it in Firefox 107. Maybe Firefox will hit the web compat issues before Chrome?

> Because that's the platform convention and matches idiomatic JS.

Ok. Should there perhaps be a non-normative note saying that while in the past it was common to use [NoInterfaceObject], this is discouraged in order to match idiomatic JS?

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/webidl/issues/1236#issuecomment-1326611759
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/webidl/issues/1236/1326611759@github.com>

Received on Thursday, 24 November 2022 15:45:35 UTC