Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Cookies Having Independent Partitioned State (CHIPS) (#654)

I'm not @krgovind but as noted in https://github.com/privacycg/proposals/issues/30#issuecomment-1113257336 there's concrete interest from other browsers (than Chrome) in the proposal subject to a few details such as avoiding a tight integration with FPS in the spec, so that browsers may support CHIPS without also shipping FPS. I actually think the CHIPS explainer is already worded in a way that makes it work, i.e. saying:

> Third parties which are embedded in multiple sites that are all in the same [First-Party Set](https://github.com/privacycg/first-party-sets) may use the same cookie jar partition across those sites.

...which isn't applicable for browsers that don't support FPS. I would still expect us to leave these parts out of the final CHIPS specification and patch them in FPS instead, while FPS is still under discussion. I think that's the expectation from other implementors as well.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/654#issuecomment-1135654395
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/654/1135654395@github.com>