- From: hober <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 13:21:15 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2022 20:21:27 UTC
Hi @hayatoito さん, @plinss, special guest @pes10k, and I took another quick look at this during our San Diego F2F today. I'm very sympathetic to @ShivanKaul's concern (labeled "1") raised in [this comment](https://github.com/WICG/webpackage/issues/648#issuecomment-965744330) & expanded upon [in this subsequent comment](https://github.com/WICG/webpackage/issues/648#issuecomment-966675864). Breaking ad blockers feels like a non-starter to me; it inverts the Priority of Constituencies without apparent justification. The alternative approach advocated by @littledan in [this issue](https://github.com/WICG/webpackage/issues/623) doesn't prevent ad blockers from working and (it seems to me) addresses your use cases. You note in [this comment](https://github.com/WICG/webpackage/issues/648#issuecomment-966003341) that this alternative solution hasn't seen much activity recently. Given that it addresses your use cases without breaking ad blockers, why are you not pursuing it instead? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/616#issuecomment-1076782465 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/616/1076782465@github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2022 20:21:27 UTC