Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Early design review: Subresource loading with Web Bundles (#616)

Hi TAG review folks and @hober!

Let me re-open this TAG review because we have several updates and we are now preparing to ship this feature.

- We have a long term plan [here](https://github.com/WICG/webpackage/issues/648). Note that the scope of TAG review is only *v1*. Our intention is to ship MVP (v1) at first, so that we can mitigate the risk of "develop everything and ship them all at once", which we'd like to avoid.

- Regarding converging to one approach, we had a discussion about how to converge two proposals [here](https://github.com/WICG/webpackage/issues/699). Currently we can consider Bundle Preloading is a feature enhancement, which can be explored in v2, as mentioned in the [long term plan](https://github.com/WICG/webpackage/issues/648).

- We are now writing the [spec](https://wicg.github.io/webpackage/subresource-loading.html), in addition to the [Explainer](https://github.com/WICG/webpackage/blob/main/explainers/subresource-loading.md). Wring the spec is on-going effort, and probably we can finish to write in a few weeks, as a preparation of sending "Intent to Ship" in blink-dev. In this TAG review's context, the explainer is probably enough, but just for your info if this is helpful to review.

- We are at ["Step 6: Prepare to Ship"](https://www.chromium.org/blink/launching-features/#step-6-prepare-to-ship) in [The Chromium process to launch a new feature](https://www.chromium.org/blink/launching-features/#the-chromium-process-to-launch-a-new-feature).  We have been conducting Origin Trials, and the outcome is promising. We'd like to make sure the current API doesn't have any outstanding major concerns through this TAG review!

If you need any other info, we're happy to do that!


-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/616#issuecomment-1067615089
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/616/1067615089@github.com>