Re: [whatwg/fetch] Acknowledge interaction with draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https scheme redirect (#1325)

@annevk commented on this pull request.

This looks somewhat reasonable, modulo reshuffling "resolve a domain". Should we also have a follow-up on reconsidering HSTS integration?

> + <p>It is <a>implementation-defined</a> whether other DNS queries might be performed to get
+ connection information beyond just <a for=/>IP addresses</a>. For example, if <var>origin</var>'s
+ <a for=origin>scheme</a> is "http" or "https", the implementation might perform a DNS query for
+ HTTPS RRs. [[SVCB]]

This shouldn't be a note. It seems this should be part of the step that turns a domain into an IP address, no? Although I suppose this does highlight that the "resolve a domain" algorithm maybe ought to take an origin and not a domain.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/1325#pullrequestreview-907525509
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/fetch/pull/1325/review/907525509@github.com>