Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Support Storage Partitioning (PR #383)

@annevk commented on this pull request.



> @@ -65,6 +66,8 @@ spec: ecma262; urlPrefix: https://tc39.github.io/ecma262/
 spec: storage; urlPrefix: https://storage.spec.whatwg.org/
     type: dfn
         text: storage bucket; url: storage-bucket
+        text: storage key; url: storage-key

I think part of the problem here is that the existing language hasn't been modified to use storage shelves. Then you wouldn't have to link "storage key" directly I think.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/pull/383#discussion_r888811128
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3c/IndexedDB/pull/383/review/994719699@github.com>