Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Support Storage Partitioning (PR #383)

@inexorabletash commented on this pull request.



> @@ -65,6 +66,8 @@ spec: ecma262; urlPrefix: https://tc39.github.io/ecma262/
 spec: storage; urlPrefix: https://storage.spec.whatwg.org/
     type: dfn
         text: storage bucket; url: storage-bucket
+        text: storage key; url: storage-key

Yeah, that's https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/pull/334 which got complicated and stalled since as written it _also_ relied on non-exported concepts. I'll need to stare at it for a while to remember how far along that was.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/pull/383#discussion_r889170352
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3c/IndexedDB/pull/383/review/995228481@github.com>

Received on Friday, 3 June 2022 17:07:42 UTC