- From: Tom Schuster <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2022 02:01:26 -0800
- To: whatwg/streams <streams@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Sunday, 16 January 2022 10:01:39 UTC
Thank you for investigating this! I certainly assumed it's possible, but had some trouble coming up with a test case myself. What I [came up with](https://gist.github.com/evilpie/fcbf5ea15440462fbbbfffd2c0e1a761) myself was using setTimeout and wasn't really reliable. > Any chunks enqueued between those events will be dropped: the pipe will read them (because it hasn't yet released its reader), but will be unable to write them to the destination (because it's already errored). That is exactly what I was concerned about. I don't really have any ideas on how to fix this myself. I guess we really don't want to wait on the last read as well? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/1207#issuecomment-1013845090 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <whatwg/streams/issues/1207/1013845090@github.com>
Received on Sunday, 16 January 2022 10:01:39 UTC