Re: [whatwg/url] Are drive letters always invalid? (#612)

Looking at this again, I think that the writing section for file URLs still reflects the situation from before #405, where (normalised/ resolved) file URLs that had a drive could not have a host. Which is great.  Updating it to reflect #405 should simplify things, which is nice!

A question is, if the drive letter should be included as a production in the grammar (the writing rules) for file URLs. I expected that to be the case, but it seems that they’re not distinguished from ordinary path components right now. 

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/url/issues/612#issuecomment-1013132511

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/url/issues/612/1013132511@github.com>

Received on Friday, 14 January 2022 13:48:46 UTC