- From: andruud <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2022 05:45:53 -0800
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/706@github.com>
Braw mornin' TAG! I'm requesting a TAG review of the new `lv*`, `sv*`, `dv*`, `vi`, `vb` units. The new units are similar to the existing viewport units (`vw`, `vh`), except that they take into account the size of expandable/collapsible browser UI in a few different ways. - Explainer: - This brief article explains it well: https://www.bram.us/2021/07/08/the-large-small-and-dynamic-viewports/ - Even more brief article which shows the problem with the existing units: https://chanind.github.io/javascript/2019/09/28/avoid-100vh-on-mobile-web.html - Specification URL: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-4/#viewport-variants - Tests: N/A, unfortunately WPT can't cover the dynamic UI aspects of this. - User research: - Security and Privacy self-review: Does not expose new information that's not already exposed via JS. - GitHub repo: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts - Primary contacts: - @andruud, Google, Working on the implementation in Chromium. - Organization(s)/project(s) driving the specification: CSSWG - Key pieces of existing multi-stakeholder review or discussion of this specification: - External status/issue trackers for this specification (publicly visible, e.g. Chrome Status): Further details: - [X] I have reviewed the TAG's [Web Platform Design Principles](https://www.w3.org/TR/design-principles/) - Relevant time constraints or deadlines: Q1 2022 - The group where the work on this specification is currently being done: CSSWG - Major unresolved issues with or opposition to this specification: - Not necessarily major nor opposition, but maybe interesting: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6551 https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6453 - This work is being funded by: You should also know that... - Safari has recently shipped support for these units. We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as (please delete all but the desired option): 🐛 open issues in our GitHub repo for **each point of feedback** -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/706 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/706@github.com>
Received on Friday, 7 January 2022 13:46:06 UTC