- From: Mattias Buelens <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2022 07:28:44 -0800
- To: whatwg/streams <streams@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 5 January 2022 15:28:57 UTC
> I slightly lean TypeError? We use it for a lot of similar situations in this spec, and now that abort reasons are a thing, we don't use AbortError DOMException directly at all. Fair enough. In #1103 we had an alternative API proposal: `readable.getReader({ signal })`. If we went that route, it *would* have made sense to reject with the signal's abort reason instead. But with the current API proposal, there's indeed no real interaction with an `AbortSignal`. If desired, users could always propagate their abort reason manually: ```javascript const abortController = new AbortController(); const { signal } = abortController; const reader = readable.getReader(); signal.addEventListener("abort", () => { // Cannot propagate `signal.reason` to `releaseLock()` reader.releaseLock(); }); const read = reader.read().catch((e) => { // `e` will be a new `TypeError` instead of `signal.reason` here. // A user could propagate it manually though, if necessary: if (signal.aborted) { throw signal.reason; } throw e; }).then(/* ... */); abortController.abort(new Error("my custom abort reason")); ``` -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/streams/pull/1168#issuecomment-1005807487 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <whatwg/streams/pull/1168/c1005807487@github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 5 January 2022 15:28:57 UTC