Re: [whatwg/webidl] Export getter/setter steps, and note the tools you have access to when defining them. (PR #1130)

I mean, you're already *saying* them at every usage site (at least, if you follow the recommended wording). Adding a `[==]` to the source, and an underline to the output, is basically nil in comparison, and in return you get a nice link making it clear that this is a term of art, and exactly what it means.

And yeah, doing the same for method steps makes sense, I just hadn't seen that yet. I'll throw them in, one sec.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/webidl/pull/1130#issuecomment-1110081303
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/webidl/pull/1130/c1110081303@github.com>