Re: [whatwg/url] Editorial: clarify URL validity (PR #666)

@domenic commented on this pull request.



> @@ -1160,7 +1160,7 @@ unified model would be, please file an issue.
 
 <ul>
  <li><p>The <a>URL parser</a> takes an arbitrary string and returns either failure or a
- <a for=/>URL</a>.
+ <a for=/>URL</a>. It might also record zero or more <a>validation errors</a>.

We do not, and I strongly suspect they are not equivalent. I think there are some open issues on it.

My preferred strategy has been to instrument whatwg-url with both modes of validation and fuzz to find examples where they mismatch. I haven't made the time to do so yet though. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/url/pull/666#discussion_r735881907

Received on Monday, 25 October 2021 19:05:19 UTC