- From: Mason Freed <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 16:13:27 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 21 October 2021 23:13:40 UTC
@plinss thanks for the comments. Have you seen [the research page for `<popup>`](https://open-ui.org/components/popup.research) on OpenUI? If not, I'd encourage you to take a look. I do think the approach is being fairly well thought-out. Perhaps not satisfyingly, the answer is "both". As you'll see on that page, a `<popup>` can be defined fairly broadly, and in significant detail, as an element that can be used on its own. It also forms a "base class" for several more-specific types of UI that share the base behaviors of `<popup>` but add or modify them in various ways. Those sub-class elements have high level semantics that map closely to ARIA roles. The super-class is more generic, and is basically "a lightweight, ephemeral piece of UI content that is displayed on top of page content". -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/680#issuecomment-949068918
Received on Thursday, 21 October 2021 23:13:40 UTC