- From: Darien Maillet Valentine <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 19:07:14 -0700
- To: whatwg/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 15 October 2021 02:07:26 UTC
Meta aside, not specific to this but I think this discussion is an example of it: It seems like duplicate (but not nec "complete") statements of requirements and constraints is a repeated issue in the spec currently and in some cases it's unclear where to look for the normative statement. The place where I've run into this most is extended attributes, where sections for various constructs state which extended attributes are applicable and then sections for extended attributes repeat this in a different way ... but they do not always say the same things, e.g. if you went by the former, [Unscopable] applies to no constructs at all. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/webidl/pull/940#issuecomment-943924610
Received on Friday, 15 October 2021 02:07:26 UTC