- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 05:33:12 -0700
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <whatwg/fetch/pull/1311/review/778495695@github.com>
@annevk commented on this pull request. I like the idea of using a task to synchronize. Nice. Couple of remaining nits and it would be really great if we could secure at least one other reviewer. > @@ -4124,6 +4130,27 @@ steps: <a for=/>response</a> <var>response</var>, run these steps: <ol> + <li> + <p>If <var>response</var> is a <a>network error</a>, then: + + <ol> + <li> + <p>Set <var>response</var>'s <a for=response>URL list</a> to « <var>fetchParams</var>'s + <a for="fetch params">request</a>'s <a for=request>URL list</a>[0]</p>. This lacks a ». > <li><p>Set <var>fetchParams</var>'s <a for="fetch params">request</a>'s <a for=request>done flag</a>. <li><p>If <var>fetchParams</var>'s <a for="fetch params">process response done</a> is not null, - then <a>queue a fetch task</a> to run <var>fetchParams</var>'s - <a for="fetch params">process response done</a> given <var>response</var>, - with <var>fetchParams</var>'s <a for="fetch params">task destination</a>. + then run <var>fetchParams</var>'s <a for="fetch params">process response done</a> with + <var>response</var>. +</ol> + +<p>To <dfn>finalize network response</dfn> given a <a for=/>fetch params</a> <var>fetchParams</var> +and a <a for=/>response</a> <var>response</var>, <a>queue a fetch task</a> +with to run the following steps with <var>fetchParams</var>'s +<a for="fetch params">task destination</a>:</p> + +<ol> + <li><p>Set <var>fetchParams</var>'s <a for=response>network read complete flag</a>.</p></li> Nit: indentation. > </ol> <p>To <dfn>finalize response</dfn> given a <a for=/>fetch params</a> <var>fetchParams</var> and a -<a for=/>response</a> <var>response</var>, run these steps: +<a for=/>response</a> <var>response</var>, run these steps:</p> Nit: remove closing tag. > <ol> + <li><p>Assert: these steps are running as part of <var>fetchParams</var>'s + <a for="fetch params">task destination</a>.</p></li> I'm not sure this makes sense. I guess let's remove it for now? > @@ -2035,6 +2035,12 @@ description of the attack. <dfn for=response id=concept-response-timing-allow-passed>timing allow passed flag</dfn>, which is initially unset. +<p>A <a for=/>response</a> has an associated +<dfn for=response>network read complete flag</dfn>, which is initially unset. + +<p>A <a for=/>response</a> has an associated +<dfn for=response>ready for clients flag</dfn>, which is initially unset. Why store these on response and not fetch params? > <li><p>Set <var>fetchParams</var>'s <a for="fetch params">request</a>'s <a for=request>done flag</a>. <li><p>If <var>fetchParams</var>'s <a for="fetch params">process response done</a> is not null, - then <a>queue a fetch task</a> to run <var>fetchParams</var>'s - <a for="fetch params">process response done</a> given <var>response</var>, - with <var>fetchParams</var>'s <a for="fetch params">task destination</a>. + then run <var>fetchParams</var>'s <a for="fetch params">process response done</a> with + <var>response</var>. +</ol> + +<p>To <dfn>finalize network response</dfn> given a <a for=/>fetch params</a> <var>fetchParams</var> Let's call this "fetch network finale" and put it before "finalize response". -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/1311#pullrequestreview-778495695
Received on Wednesday, 13 October 2021 12:33:25 UTC