- From: Marcos Cáceres <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2021 01:52:57 -0700
- To: w3c/manifest <manifest@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3c/manifest/pull/1011/review/770025787@github.com>
@marcoscaceres commented on this pull request.
> @@ -1222,6 +1222,25 @@ <h3>
Updating the manifest
</h3>
<aside class="issue" data-number="446"></aside>
+ <p>
+ The manifest is fetched and processed on every page load. When the
+ processing is successful, user agents MAY apply updated manifest to
+ any current and future <a>application contexts</a>
+ associated with the application.
+ </p>
+ <p>
+ User agents SHOULD be careful about performing update to manifest
+ fields like app name and icons. Users should be fully aware if
+ such fields are to be be updated to avoid web applications being
+ installed and silently changed to appear as a different one.
+ </p>
+ <p>
+ When the user agent fetches a manifest as part of an update check,
I just realized that [=URL/equals=] allows us to "exclude fragments" as an argument, which might mean we can keep the fragment in the `id`, but ignore it for these comparisons. That might simplify `id` a little bit, because we don't need to chop the fragments anymore.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/manifest/pull/1011#discussion_r721164535
Received on Monday, 4 October 2021 08:53:10 UTC