- From: Karl <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 15:52:14 -0800
- To: whatwg/url <url@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 12 November 2021 23:52:26 UTC
Ah yes, you're right, it wouldn't work for local web development. I was thinking more about generic HTTP servers. The main drawbacks IMO are: - Complexity. This standard has a hard-enough time trying to document existing browser behaviour without inventing new things. Then again, there is a reasonable counter-argument that URLs shouldn't have to stay frozen while other aspects of technology and the web evolve to meet new use-cases. - Possible loss of validation for IPv6 addresses. Unless we want to get in to the business of validating local system paths (and I'm quite sure nobody is thrilled by that idea) we would basically have to accept any non-empty string within `[]` in the host portion of HTTP URLs. How do we know `http://[::::foo]/some/path` doesn't refer to a valid path on some system somewhere? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/url/issues/577#issuecomment-967732847
Received on Friday, 12 November 2021 23:52:26 UTC