- From: Austin Cheney <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 09:57:57 -0700
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 22 June 2021 16:58:40 UTC
@WebReflection I suspect TreeWalker is ignored because it is incredibly esoteric. It is a stand alone utility available as a part of the browsers' WebAPIs with its own internal filtration API and internal methods. Furthermore, you can eventually come to the same conclusion using a custom function wrapping TreeWalker as the internal workings of the demonstration logic, which walks element nodes. Neither are the same as a single method name requiring a single argument that does everything for you without any custom logic. -1 numerical is the SHOW_ALL for TreeWalker. The demonstration logic was only based upon nodeType values and their string constant equivalents which does not provide any value for 0 or -1. * https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/TreeWalker * https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Node/nodeType -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/992#issuecomment-866163053
Received on Tuesday, 22 June 2021 16:58:40 UTC