Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] importScripts() on ServiceWorkerGlobalScope (#1319)

> I had to delete my comments there as the OP seemed irritated

I asked you to create a new issue to discuss the changes you want made to `importScripts`, I didn't ask you to delete your comments. I'd still like you to create a new issue fwiw.

> So my reasoning is that since the dynamic import() is being allowed in a precisely defined situation in #1585 that helps WebExtensions

The changes in #1585 are designed to make `import()` somewhat similar to `importScripts`. What ability do you feel `import()` is getting in #1585 that doesn't already exist in `importScripts`? If possible please demonstrate with a reduced runnable example of the issue.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1319#issuecomment-856534161