Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] importScripts() on ServiceWorkerGlobalScope (#1319)

AFAICT, the final decision will be made in this specification anyway because browser makers really don't like to add nontrivial special cases on top of a complex spec to accommodate just one use case that's not even particularly common. So my reasoning is that since the dynamic import() is being allowed in a precisely defined situation in #1585 that helps WebExtensions among other things, the same reasoning should automatically translate to importScripts when being used in the same situation. I've tried asking in #1585 but apparently I failed to convey the sameness of the use case so I had to delete my comments there as the OP seemed irritated.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1319#issuecomment-856501238